USA flag

Australia takes a food safety tip from The States

In a move inspired by recent developments in the United States, Australian food safety officials are beginning to explore the potential of social media as a tool for identifying breaches in food safety standards.

The idea stems from the growing trend of using online platforms to detect food-borne illness outbreaks based on user-generated content such as reviews, comments, and complaints.

Australians have been actively reviewing their dining experiences on platforms like the local version of Yelp, with more than 6,000 restaurants and cafes — along with hundreds of bars and other food outlets — receiving feedback from customers. These reviews, often candid and detailed, provide a rich source of information that could help authorities pinpoint venues linked to cases of food poisoning or poor hygiene practices.

While the NSW Department of Health currently relies on traditional methods for handling public complaints about restaurant hygiene, officials have acknowledged the potential value of tapping into social media data. Although they haven’t yet used platforms like Yelp or Facebook to investigate food safety incidents, they are taking steps toward integrating digital tools into their approach. One of the first initiatives includes using online surveys to more efficiently identify outbreaks and gather public feedback.

As Australia begins to embrace technology in its efforts to safeguard public health, the use of social media could become a powerful ally in identifying and addressing food safety concerns. 

Read the original article here.

[remotepage page="shipping-insurance.html"]
Latency explained

What is latency?

Latency, when it comes to temperature logging, refers to the delay between a change in temperature and when that change is detected and recorded by the logger. This delay can be due to the sensor’s design, the materials it’s placed in, or the logging interval. While it might sound like a disadvantage, latency can actually serve a useful purpose in certain environments—particularly where short-term temperature spikes are common but not harmful.

For example, in a busy commercial fridge, the temperature may briefly rise every time the door is opened. A logger with high latency won’t immediately react to these short fluctuations, helping to avoid unnecessary alarms or false data indicating a problem when there isn’t one. In these cases, a slight delay in response acts like a filter, focusing attention on real issues—such as prolonged exposure to unsafe temperatures—while ignoring the everyday ups and downs that don’t affect product quality or safety.

Differrnt connections

Connecting your logger

Depending on the type of logger you have, connecting your logger to your PC means either:

  • inserting into the Reader,
  • plugging it into a USB port, or
  • connecting it via a USB cable.
comparing gen1 and gen 2

What's so good about USB?

First Generation LogTags use a separate Reader (sometimes called a dock) for configuration and for downloading recorded data. 

The Second Generation loggers only require a USB port or cable. Apart from saving the cost of the Reader, this makes them much better suited for shipping, because the recipient doesn’t need a LogTag Reader to download a report about the shipment’s journey.

comparing gen1 and gen 2